Appwrite or Supabase
Stack
Comparison
Firebase if you want maturity. Appwrite if you want independence.
Tool A
Appwrite
The open source backend that replaces Firebase auth, database, storage and functions.
Tool B
Firebase
Google's BaaS: auth, Firestore, hosting, functions. Powerful but captive.
| Criterion | Appwrite | Firebase |
|---|---|---|
| In my stack | Yes | Yes |
| My rating | 4.5 out of 5 | 4.4 out of 5 |
| What it does better | Open source, self-hostable, no vendor lock-in, GDPR-native | Richer ecosystem, more scalable Firestore, built-in Google Analytics |
| What it does worse | Less mature, smaller community, fewer side services | Total vendor lock-in, prices that explode at scale, data at Google |
| Entry price | €0 | €0 |
| Plan I would pick | Cloud Pro · €15/member | Blaze (Pay as you go) · Variable |
| Works with | macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, Browser, API, n8n | macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, Browser, API, n8n, Zapier, Make |
| Where the opinion comes from | Compared from my Firebase review | Compared from my Appwrite review |
Verdict
Firebase if you want maturity. Appwrite if you want independence.
Appwrite if you want independence. Firebase if you want maturity and the Google ecosystem.
Stack
Stack